Reviewer list for 2003

Reviewer No. 2 checklist for: DMARDS Review for children In the WHO Essential Medicines List

The k-Allocation Problem and Its Variants

In the process of reviewing and ranking projects by a group of reviewers, each reviewer is assumed to review a partial list of projects, up to k projects. Each individual reviewer then ranks and compares all pairs of k projects. The k-allocation problem is to determine the allocation of up to k projects to each reviewer within the expertise set of the reviewer so that the resulting union of rev...

Ethical Patient Prioritization in Disaster Triage: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

Background: Disasters are medically defined as events in which the demands for patients’ care far exceed the available resources. In such situations, triage and rationing of limited resources are inevitable. A decision regarding triage needs not only scientific guidelines but also an ethical framework and supporting policies. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the criteria for...

PLOS Biology 2017 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You

PLOS and the PLOS Biology team would like to express our sincere gratitude to everyone who lent us their expertise as an academic editor, as a guest editor or as a peer reviewer in 2016. We are fully dependent on the voluntary efforts of these experts to publish the journal for the academic community. Over the past year, PLOS Biology relied on 286 academic and guest editors to manage the more t...

PLOS Medicine 2016 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You

PLOS and the PLOS Medicine team would like to express our sincere gratitude to everyone who lent us their expertise as an academic editor, as a guest editor or as a peer reviewer in 2016. We are fully dependent on the voluntary efforts of these experts to publish the journal for the academic community and the wider readership concerned with human health. Over the past year, PLOS Medicine relied...